CO129-351 - Public Offices - 1908 — Page 785

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

I discussed the question with His Excellency Liang Tun-yen. I reminded him of the principal steps in the negotiations which are recapitulated in Mr. Bland's memorandum, and stated that as far as I could understand, these negotiations were held in check by certain claims of the Belgian Minister which were based on Sheng's letter of June 26th 1898 and on the unredeemed bonds. I expressed a hope that the Belgian contentions, which had no rational basis, would not be listened to, and warned His Excellency that if they were seriously entertained by the Chinese Government, I should be compelled to protest vigorously. I produced a copy of Chang Chih-tung's letter of September 9th 1905, which His Excellency knew of but had not read, and he readily acknowledged that it gave us clear preferential rights. According to him the Waiwupu did not admit the Belgian claims, but the "Belgian representative had been told that there was nothing to prevent his people from quoting terms for the loan. To this I said there was no objection provided that the conditions of Chang's engagement were borne in mind and the British financiers given

Edit History

2026-06-06 11:57:34 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
I discussed the question with His Excellency Liang Tun-yen. I reminded him of the principal steps in the negotiations which are recapitulated in Mr. Bland's memorandum, and stated that as far as I could understand, these negotiations were held in check by certain claims of the Belgian Minister which were based on Sheng's letter of June 26th 1898 and on the unredeemed bonds. I expressed a hope that the Belgian contentions, which had no rational basis, would not be listened to, and warned His Excellency that if they were seriously entertained by the Chinese Government, I should be compelled to protest vigorously. I produced a copy of Chang Chih-tung's letter of September 9th 1905, which His Excellency knew of but had not read, and he readily acknowledged that it gave us clear preferential rights. According to him the Waiwupu did not admit the Belgian claims, but the "Belgian representative had been told that there was nothing to prevent his people from quoting terms for the loan. To this I said there was no objection provided that the conditions of Chang's engagement were borne in mind and the British financiers given
Baseline (Original)
ન્ય 1) 773 whole I discussed the question with His Excellency Liang Tun-yen. I reminded him of the principal steps in the negotiations which are recapitulated in Mr.Bland's memorandum, and atated that as far as I could understand, these negotiations were held in check by certain claims of the Telgian Minister which were based on Sheng's letter of June 26th 1898 and on the unredeemed bonds. I expressed a hope that the Telgian contentions, which had no rational basis, would not be listened to, and warned His Excellency that if they were seriously entertained by the Chinese Government, I should be compelled to protest vigorously. I produced a copy of Chang Chih-tung's letter of September 9th 1905, which His Excellency knew of but had not read, and he readily acknowledged that it gave us clear preferential rights. According to him the Waiwupu did not admit the Meleian claime, but the "elgian representative had been told that there was nothing to prevent his people from quoting terms for the loan. To this I said there was no objection provided that the conditions of Chang's engagement were borne in mind and the British financiers given
2026-06-06 11:57:34 · Baseline
View content

ન્ય

1)

773

whole

I discussed the question with His Excellency Liang

Tun-yen. I reminded him of the principal steps in the

negotiations which are recapitulated in Mr.Bland's

memorandum, and atated that as far as I could understand,

these negotiations were held in check by certain claims

of the Telgian Minister which were based on Sheng's

letter of June 26th 1898 and on the unredeemed bonds.

I expressed a hope that the Telgian contentions, which

had no rational basis, would not be listened to, and

warned His Excellency that if they were seriously

entertained by the Chinese Government, I should be

compelled to protest vigorously. I produced a copy of

Chang Chih-tung's letter of September 9th 1905, which

His Excellency knew of but had not read, and he readily

acknowledged that it gave us clear preferential rights.

According to him the Waiwupu did not admit the Meleian

claime, but the "elgian representative had been told

that there was nothing to prevent his people from

quoting terms for the loan. To this I said there was no

objection provided that the conditions of Chang's

engagement were borne in mind and the British financiers

given

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.